World reacts to UNSC resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire | Israel War on Gaza News

Many world leaders have welcomed a United Nations Safety Council (UNSC) decision that calls for a direct ceasefire between Israel and the Palestinian group Hamas in Gaza.

Whereas america abstained from the vote on Monday, the remaining 14 council members voted for the decision.

The decision, which the US mentioned it didn’t agree with in its entirety, requires an “fast ceasefire” in the course of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, which ends in two weeks. It requires the ceasefire to result in a “lasting” truce, for the discharge of all hostages held by Hamas in Gaza, and for respect for worldwide legislation from every occasion with regards to detainments.

Listed below are some reactions from key officers around the globe:

Palestinian Ministry of International Affairs

The ministry mentioned that adopting the decision is a step in the proper course to finish the five-month struggle, to permit the entry of help, and to start the return of these displaced.

The ministry additionally referred to as on UNSC member states to meet their authorized duties to implement the decision instantly. The ministry careworn the significance of reaching a everlasting ceasefire that extends past Ramadan – together with securing the entry of help, working to launch prisoners, and stopping pressured displacement.

Fatah Central Committee member Sabri Saidam

Saidam mentioned the decision “is a step in the proper course main in the direction of the top of the continuing bloodbath in Palestine”.

“The consensus we witnessed at this time ought to pave the best way for the complete recognition of the much-delayed rights of the Palestinians and independence of the State of Palestine,” Saidam instructed Al Jazeera.

Hamas official Basem Naim

The Palestinian group Hamas mentioned it was dedicated to the circumstances of the decision and mentioned Israel have to be held accountable in adhering to it.

“It’s the position of the worldwide group to oblige Israel and to finish this double customary,” Basem Naim, a senior official in Hamas’s political bureau, instructed Al Jazeera.

“The query is ‘How sturdy is the worldwide group to oblige Israel to implement this decision?’” he mentioned.

The group additionally careworn the need of reaching a everlasting ceasefire that results in the withdrawal of all Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip, and affirmed its readiness to interact in a direct alternate course of that results in the discharge of prisoners on either side.

Israeli ambassador to the UN Gilad Erdan

Erdan mentioned the decision did not demand a ceasefire with out “conditioning” it on the discharge of captives in Gaza, saying it “undermines the efforts to safe their launch”.

“It’s dangerous to those efforts as a result of it offers Hamas terrorists hope to get a ceasefire with out releasing the hostages. All members of the council … ought to have voted in opposition to this shameless decision,” he mentioned.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Shortly after the decision handed, Netanyahu cancelled the go to of an Israeli delegation to Washington, DC, which the US had requested to debate issues over a proposed Israeli invasion of Rafah, a metropolis in crowded southern Gaza.

The US abstention was “a transparent retreat from the constant place of the US”, and would damage Israel’s struggle efforts and bid to launch the hostages nonetheless held by Hamas, the prime minister’s workplace mentioned.

US White Home

The White Home mentioned in an announcement that Washington’s abstention from the vote “doesn’t symbolize a shift in our coverage … however as a result of the ultimate textual content doesn’t have the language that we expect is important, like a condemnation of Hamas, we couldn’t help it”.

White Home spokesperson John Kirby mentioned that US officers had been “very disillusioned about Netanyahu’s choice to not ship his advisers for talks on the White Home in regards to the Rafah operation”.

UN Secretary-Common Antonio Guterres

The UN official mentioned the decision “have to be applied”, including that failure to take action could be “unforgivable”.

The Safety Council simply accredited a long-awaited decision on Gaza, demanding a direct ceasefire, and the fast and unconditional launch of all hostages.

This decision have to be applied. Failure could be unforgivable.

— António Guterres (@antonioguterres) March 25, 2024

China’s ambassador to the UN Zhang Jun

“After repeated vetos of the council’s actions, america lastly determined to cease obstructing the council’s calls for for a direct ceasefire. Regardless of all this, the US nonetheless tried to search out all types of excuses and made accusations in opposition to China,” mentioned China’s ambassador to the UN, Zhang Jun.

“For the lives which have already perished, the council decision at this time comes too late, however for the tens of millions of individuals in Gaza who stay mired in an unprecedented humanitarian disaster, this decision, if absolutely and successfully applied, might nonetheless convey long-awaited hope,” he added.

Russia’s ambassador to the UN Vasily Alekseyevich Nebenzya

Nebenzya mentioned Moscow hopes the decision will likely be used within the “pursuits of peace” slightly than advancing the “inhumane Israeli operation in opposition to Palestinians”.

He mentioned Russia most popular a model of the textual content that demanded {that a} Ramadan ceasefire would result in “a everlasting sustainable ceasefire”.

“We’re disillusioned that it didn’t make it by means of. However, we consider it’s essentially essential to vote in favour of peace. The council should proceed to work on reaching a everlasting ceasefire,” he mentioned.

French ambassador to the UN Nicolas de Riviere

De Riviere mentioned the adoption of the decision exhibits that the UNSC can “nonetheless act when all of its members make the mandatory effort to discharge their mandate”.

“The Safety Council’s silence on Gaza was changing into deafening. It’s excessive time now for the council to lastly contribute to discovering an answer,” he instructed the session.

He additionally mentioned that work must be carried out to ascertain a everlasting ceasefire and to revive the political course of to convey in regards to the two-state answer.

UK ambassador to the UN Barbara Woodward

Woodward mentioned London “regrets” that the decision didn’t condemn the October 7 Hamas assault and careworn that the UK “condemns” the assaults “unequivocally”.

Woodward additionally mentioned that the decision sends a “clear” message on the necessity for worldwide humanitarian legislation to be upheld.

“We name for this decision to be applied instantly. President, we have to concentrate on how we chart the best way from a direct humanitarian pause to a long-lasting, sustainable peace with out a return to preventing,” she mentioned.

“Which means the formation of a brand new Palestinian authorities for the West Financial institution and Gaza accompanied by a world help bundle,” she mentioned.

Algeria consultant to the UN Amar Bendjama

Bendjama mentioned the Safety Council was “lastly shouldering its duty as the first organ liable for sustaining worldwide peace and safety”.

“I wish to thank all of the council members for his or her flexibility and the constructive method that allowed us at this time to undertake this long-awaited decision, [a] decision that requires a direct ceasefire within the Gaza Strip in an effort to put an finish to the massacres that sadly are nonetheless ongoing over the 5 months,” he mentioned.

“This massacre has continued for much too lengthy.”

Slovenia’s envoy to the UN Samuel Zbogar

“UNSC delivered the strongest sign to date: We demand a direct ceasefire for the month of Ramadan resulting in a long-lasting ceasefire. It’s a name now we have all been determined to listen to from the council,” mentioned Samuel Zbogar, Slovenia’s envoy.

We welcome the adoption of UNSCR 2728 demanding a direct ceasefire in #Gaza for the month of Ramadan resulting in a long-lasting sustainable ceasefire.

This decision exhibits the E10 management for peace. pic.twitter.com/HH7Wpsrzv6

— Slovenia to the UN (@SLOtoUN) March 25, 2024

European Fee President Ursula von der Leyen

The European Fee’s president welcomed the passing of the decision.

“Implementation of this decision is important for the safety of all civilians,” she mentioned on X.

I welcome the adoption by UN Safety Council of a decision demanding a direct ceasefire in Gaza, and the fast & unconditional launch of all hostages.

Implementation of this decision is important for the safety of all civilians.

— Ursula von der Leyen (@vonderleyen) March 25, 2024

Human Rights Watch UN director Louis Charbonneau

Charbonneau mentioned Israel “wants to right away reply” to the decision “by facilitating the supply of humanitarian help, ending its hunger of Gaza’s inhabitants, and halting illegal assaults”.

“Palestinian armed teams ought to instantly launch all civilians held hostage. The US and different international locations ought to use their leverage to finish atrocities by suspending arms transfers to Israel,” he mentioned.