‘Not Likely to Happen’ – Jonathan Turley Explains Why Letitia James Won’t be Able to Seize Trump’s Assets (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

Constitutional legislation professor Jonathan Turley weighed in on Letitia James’ newest transfer to grab Trump’s belongings.

Marxist New York Legal professional Normal Letitia James on Thursday took the initial step to grab Trump’s belongings. She filed judgments in Westchester County the place Trump’s personal property and golf course is positioned.

President Trump has till Monday to both pay the judgment or persuade the appellate courtroom to permit him to defer the cost pending attraction.

Turley mentioned James’ effort to grab his belongings and padlock Trump Tower shouldn’t be more likely to occur as a result of Trump’s properties are advanced partnerships with leveraged debt.

“The penalty handed down is absurd,” Turley mentioned to Fox Enterprise host Larry Kudlow.

“These properties are partnerships, they’ve leveraged debt – all of that must be unraveled. So these aren’t simply this, you recognize, the one-to-one Trump versus James sort of equation. So with a purpose to seize that property, she’s going to be pulled into courtroom, there’s going to be challenges. It’s not going to occur in a single day. Whereas everyone seems to be celebrating this concept that she’s going to padlock Trump Tower. It’s not more likely to occur, and it’s actually not more likely to stay very lengthy.”

Turley continued, “The opposite factor is that she might be harming the worth of the property that she’s attempting to grab with a few of these actions. I don’t assume that issues to her, nevertheless it would possibly matter to a courtroom.”

WATCH:

Jonathan Turley Pours Chilly Water On Letitia James’ Plans To Seize Trump’s Belongings pic.twitter.com/94VCC5ihpe

— Illinois woman Desi (@d_ewinger) March 23, 2024

Trump’s authorized crew has filed an attraction and requested a keep on the large $464 million judgment.

On Thursday Trump’s attorneys despatched a letter to the Appellate Division of New York’s Supreme Court docket and asserted Letitia James’ actions are “unconstitutional.”

“It might be utterly illogical — and the definition of an unconstitutional Extreme Nice and a Taking — to require Defendants to promote properties in any respect, and particularly in a ‘hearth sale,’ so as to have the ability to attraction the lawless Supreme Court docket judgment, as that will trigger hurt that can not be repaired as soon as the Defendants do win, as is overwhelmingly probably, on attraction,” Trump’s lawyer Cliff Robert wrote.

Trump’s lawyer additionally mentioned Letitia James’ demand that Trump pay the judgment in full with a purpose to attraction is “unreasonable, unjust, and unconstitutional (beneath each the Federal and New York State Constitutions) bond situation, which might trigger irreparable hurt and foreclose any evaluation of Supreme Court docket’s deeply flawed resolution on this case.”

Far-left New York Choose Arthur Engoron on Thursday additionally ruled Trump should inform a court-appointed monitor *upfront* about his effort to safe attraction bonds in Letitia James’ Soviet-style fraud case with no sufferer.

The impartial courtroom monitor, Barbara Jones, is a former federal choose appointed by Invoice Clinton.