Moms for Liberty Founder Destroys Joy Reid During Attempted ‘Gotcha’ Interview on Banned LGBTQ Books and Parental Rights (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit

Tiffany Justice, co-founder of Mothers for Liberty, showcased a formidable show of wit and information, successfully destroying MSNBC host Pleasure Reid, one among America’s poster youngsters for stupidity, over the difficulty of parental rights and e-book banning in faculties.

Reid opened the section by questioning whether or not LGBTQ and liberal dad and mom have the identical parental rights as others, to which Justice responded affirmatively, stating that “each guardian means each guardian has the elemental proper to direct the upbringing of their youngsters.”

The dialogue instantly moved to the center of the difficulty: express and graphic sexual content material present in some books.

Justice argued that no books had been being banned however moderately faraway from public college libraries, drawing a parallel with the restriction of sure web websites in faculties. She emphasised that Mothers for Liberty was not about banning however advocating for applicable content material at school settings.

“I need to be clear: nobody’s banning books. Write the e-book, print the e-book, publish the e-book, put the e-book within the public library, promote the e-book, proper? We’re speaking a few public college library,” mentioned Justice.

“Kids don’t have unfettered entry to the web in school. I did a FOIA information request, and I wished to see what sorts of web websites are banned in faculties if we’re going to speak about banning, proper? And the subject material within the books that mothers are involved about are the identical issues that children don’t have entry to on the web. So, it simply feels very hypocritical, proper? Why is nobody on the market protesting the web at school?” she added.

WATCH:

“Nobody’s banning books.

“Write the e-book, print the e-book, publish the e-book, put the e-book within the public library, promote the e-book.

“We’re speaking a few public college library. Kids don’t have unfettered entry to the web in school. … Why is nobody on the market protesting… pic.twitter.com/TvwIaVsxf1

— Tiffany Justice (@4TiffanyJustice) January 20, 2024

The dialog shifted to particular books which have been faraway from college libraries. Justice clarified that Mothers for Liberty doesn’t have a nationwide e-book record however encourages dad and mom to develop into knowledgeable advocates by reviewing supplies out there to their youngsters.

Reid raised the difficulty of Booklooks, an internet site used extensively by Mothers for Liberty for researching books. Reid claimed that this apply makes use of out-of-context excerpts from books to advocate for his or her removing from libraries, which Justice disagreed with.

“You’ll get out-of-context passages from the e-book, after which based mostly on that, Mothers for Liberty members are going to locations like Broward County College Board conferences, studying out-of-context passages from these books, after which demanding that the college board take away them,” claimed Reid.

“The query I’m asking is, what’s the experience that you’ve and different Mothers for Liberty advocates must resolve that an award-winning e-book like “All Boys Aren’t Blue” isn’t applicable for college students to learn?” requested Reid, who appeared clueless on the context of the e-book.

Justice defended Mothers for Liberty’s stance, arguing that sure content material, akin to descriptions of sexual acts or violence, shouldn’t be applicable for public college libraries. She emphasised the group’s want for fogeys to be told and have management over what their youngsters are uncovered to at school.

“What a tragic story of a younger man who was anally raped by his grownup member of the family. So you’ve got incest, rape, pedophilia. Pleasure, you mentioned you’d let me reply, so I’m going to reply for you. In what context is a strap-on dildo acceptable for public faculties? That’s my query to you. Inform me what the context is across the strap-on dildo or the rape of a minor baby by a instructor. We’re speaking about public college,” Justice mentioned.

WATCH:

What’s the academic worth of a narrative in regards to the anal r@pe of a younger boy by an grownup member of the family?
How about Illustrations of a teen carrying a strap-on grownup sEx toy, penetrating one other teen in a sEx act?@joyreidismyhero what’s the academic worth of books about dild*s? pic.twitter.com/hXJYQPqgEp

— Scarlett Johnson (@scarlett4kids) January 20, 2024

Reid challenged Justice on the difficulty of why a guardian who needs their baby to have entry to books containing pornography, rape, and pedophilia needs to be disadvantaged of that proper.

Pleasure Reid: Is a full context story, as you mentioned, of the creator’s expertise. Why is it your proper, or a Mother’s for Liberty activist’s proper, to say {that a} guardian who needs their baby to have entry to this e-book, which supplies a private expertise of this creator, why doesn’t a liberal guardian, as an example, or a guardian of an LGBTQ child, why don’t they’ve a proper for his or her baby to simply have entry to this e-book? Why is it your proper to say they’ll’t?

Tiffany Justice: So once more, we’re speaking about incest, rape, and pedophilia.

Pleasure Reid: Every guardian has to resolve what is suitable for his or her baby to learn. So, I need you to reply. I’m going to ask you another time. What’s your proper to inform a guardian who needs their baby, who would possibly really feel seen by this story? Why don’t they’ve the precise? Why don’t they’ve the precise as a guardian to say, my baby can have entry to this e-book?

Tiffany Justice: If a baby feels seen by this story, that implies that they’ve been the sufferer of a predator. That implies that they’ve both been raped by a member of the family or they’ve skilled.

Pleasure Reid: And your proof of that’s what?

Tiffany Justice: You simply mentioned that your baby feels seen by this story.

Pleasure Reid: You’re now making assumptions.

…

Tiffany Justice: There needs to be vibrant conversations about what’s taking place in our public faculties and what youngsters have entry to. Pleasure. Nevertheless, possibly we may simply put all of the books with all of the graphic sexual content material the dildo.

Pleasure Reid: I’m sorry.

Pleasure declines to show the express content material from the banned books, because it contradicts their narrative.

Watch the total interview under: