HUGE! New York Magazine’s Guessing Game – E. Jean Carroll Jacket Dress Comes into Question – Trump Accuser Stumbles During Testimony | The Gateway Pundit

E. Jean Carroll posed for the quilt of New York Journal in June 2019. She was carrying what she claimed was the Donna Karan jacket costume she was had worn when Donald Trump allegedly attacked her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in 1995 or 1996.  She remains to be not clear on the 12 months it passed off. Carroll mentioned she met Trump on the road they usually determined to go purchase lingerie on the high-end New York Metropolis division retailer.

New York Magaine said on its cowl, “The jacket costume she was carrying that day has hung in her closet ever since; she wore it once more for the primary time for her portrait with New York.”

E. Jean Carroll wrote her bizarre story in New York Journal in June 2019.  Carroll mentioned she stored the costume in her closet after the alleged assault.  She says she by no means wore it once more and that, “I’ve by no means had intercourse with anyone ever once more.”

She even held a photograph shoot with New York Journal within the costume.

However there was one large drawback with this girl’s story.   The Donna Karan jacket costume was not even made or offered within the mid-Nineties. The story is an entire hoax.

Trump Legal professional Boris Epshteyn spoke outdoors the courtroom in New York Metropolis the place the E. Jean Carroll case is going down in entrance of Clinton-appointed Decide Lewis Kaplan’s kangaroo courtroom.  Boris instructed reporters outdoors the courthouse that the costume E. Jean Carroll mentioned she was carrying in 1995 or 1996 when Donald Trump allegedly assaulted her was not made in 1994 as she initially said.  It’s not clear when this costume was first out there.

Legal professional Boris Epshteyn: “She mentioned, that is the costume I wore in 1994. They went again, they checked. The costume wasn’t even made in 1994. And that’s why the date’s moved round. That is the 80s. Is it the 90s? Is it the 2000s? President Trump has constantly said that he was falsely accused and he has the appropriate to defend himself.”

This isn’t the primary time Carroll lied concerning the case.  It’s also clear that Carroll lied about who was funding her lawsuit. E. Jean Carroll initially mentioned nobody was funding her lawsuit towards Trump. Later, her legal professional admitted that billionaire By no means-Trumper Reid Hoffman was funding Carroll’s lawsuit.

The alleged rape passed off a very long time in the past, a long time in the past; Carroll can’t even keep in mind the 12 months it passed off.

Right here is the video through The Warfare Room and Midnight Rider.

Now The Gateway Pundit can affirm that E. Jean Carroll testified below oath that the jacket-dress was not even offered on the time of the alleged assault.

Matthew Russell Lee at Inner City Press reported from the courtroom in New York Metropolis this week.

The Gateway Pundit can now report that we have now seen courtroom paperwork that query the veracity of E. Jean Carroll’s statements.

In line with courtroom paperwork considered by The Gateway Pundit Miss Carroll admitted throughout questioning that she might have purchased it in 1995 as a result of Donna Karan didn’t make the costume in 1994 as she believed. She solely got here to this realization after New York Journal corrected her!

Earlier than the journal printed the article they helped E. Jean Carroll work out that the costume was not made in 1994 as she initially said.

Based mostly on what she mentioned as she was sitting for the deposition E. Jean Carroll has no recollection of when the alleged assault occurred.  All she will be able to say is that it occurred a while after 1995.

It’s so imprecise and nonspecific that her story finally lacks credibility.  Her lack of information of this crucial piece of details about her Donna Karan costume makes this case completely ridiculous.

In the end, this case shouldn’t be about E. Jean Carroll versus Donald Trump – It’s about E. Jean Carroll versus E. Jean Carroll. She doesn’t have any details on this case and she or he by no means did.