The criminal hypocrisy of Hernandez’s drug conviction in a US court | Opinions

On Friday, March 8, former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández was convicted on three counts of drug trafficking and weapons conspiracy in a Manhattan federal courtroom. Extradited to the USA shortly after finishing his second presidential time period in 2022, the 55-year-old Hernández is up towards a compulsory minimal sentence of 40 years in jail.

Following the conviction, US Legal professional Normal Merrick Garland accused Hernández of getting run Honduras as a “narco-state the place violent drug traffickers have been allowed to function with digital impunity”. The US Division of Justice, Garland righteously bleated, has now proven its dedication to “disrupting your entire ecosystem of drug trafficking networks that hurt the American folks, regardless of how far or how excessive we should go”.

And but given the USA’ basic position in nurturing and sustaining this very ecosystem within the first place, the responsible verdict can safely be filed below the “Can’t Make This Up” class of imperial hypocrisy.

For starters, recall that Hernández was till very just lately a very good chum of successive US administrations, which appointed him a significant ally within the so-called “war on drugs” and flung cash at Honduras accordingly. The messianically right-wing chief got here to energy 5 years after the 2009 US-facilitated coup d’état against Manuel Zelaya, who had dared to steer the nation barely off the straight and slim path of neoliberal dystopia.

The fabricated pretext for the coup, which occurred on US President Barack Obama’s watch, was that Zelaya was scheming to stay president of Honduras in violation of the constitutional one-term restrict. Later this restrict was rapidly allotted with with a purpose to allow the continued reign of Hernández, whose re-election in 2017 was recognised by the US Donald Trump administration regardless of sweeping allegations of fraud.

Publish-election protests triggered a characteristically deadly response from Honduran safety forces, which didn’t cease the US from continuing to fund these exact same forces. Anyway, it was enterprise as ordinary in a Central American nation that the US has traditionally considered as its personal private navy base.

Throughout the Chilly Struggle, for instance, the US utilised Honduras as a launchpad for terrorising neighbouring Nicaragua, which had did not correctly undergo the charitable chokehold of US-imposed capitalism.

And what have you learnt: contributing to the conflict effort in Nicaragua was none aside from distinguished Honduran drug lord Juan Ramon Matta Ballesteros, whose airline SETCO – which helped provide US-trained Contra mercenaries – was known as the “CIA airline”. In the meantime, the drug commerce the Contras have been reaping income from helped kick off a crack cocaine epidemic in South Central Los Angeles.

How’s that for “ecosystems that hurt the American folks”?

To make sure, long-standing US involvement in drug trafficking is hardly a secret; as a New York Occasions headline from 1993 specified: “The CIA Drug Connection Is as Previous because the Company”. The CIA’s narco-operations have spanned the globe from Pakistan to Laos to Venezuela, whereas many a world narco-politician has – like Hernández – discovered at the least fleeting favour with the US authorities.

Take the case of Hernández’s fellow Central American chief Manuel Noriega, the late drug-running dictator of Panama, whose service as a CIA asset and US pal continued for many years till one high quality day in 1990, when he was hauled off to Miami to face drug trafficking and different fees. In 1992, he was sentenced to 40 years in jail – the identical sentence now looming over Hernández.

Throughout the prelude to Noriega’s extradition, the US navy bombed the living daylights out of the impoverished neighbourhood of El Chorrillo within the Panamanian capital of Panama Metropolis, killing as much as a number of thousand civilians. The neighbourhood was briefly nicknamed “Little Hiroshima”; the US dubbed the slaughter “Operation Simply Trigger”.

Objectively talking, in fact, the US was in no place to impose “justice” in Panama – and the present Hernández drug trial will not be actually a “simply trigger,” both. On the finish of the day, the USA’ erstwhile Honduran narco-buddy is merely a symptom of a US-fuelled ecosystem, not its trigger.

Furthermore, the justice system of a world superpower that’s basically answerable for institutionalising impunity within the Honduran postcoup period can’t be credited with bringing any type of justice to Honduras.

As scholar Dana Frank paperwork in her e-book The Long Honduran Night: Resistance, Terror, and the United States in the Aftermath of the Coup, US “drug conflict” funds went to assist the homicidal actions of safety guards working for biofuels magnate Miguel Facusse within the Aguan Valley in northeastern Honduras, the place small farmers looking for to say their land rights have been being “hunted down… like animals”.

Based on WikiLeaks cables, the US had recognized since at the least 2004 that Facusse was trafficking in cocaine. Frank summarises the vile verdict: “Exactly as US funding for the Honduran navy and police escalated below the pretext of combating the drug conflict, then, US-supported troops have been conducting joint operations with the safety guards of somebody the USA knew was a drug trafficker, with a purpose to violently repress a campesino motion on behalf of his unlawful claims to huge swaths of the Aguan Valley.”

Returning to US Legal professional Normal Garland’s allegations concerning the “narco-state the place violent drug traffickers have been allowed to function with digital impunity”, it’s relatively painfully apparent that stated state of affairs is 100% made within the USA – the nation whose demand for and criminalisation of medicine can also be what drives the entire narco-enterprise.

In the long run, if the US actually desires to go about “disrupting your entire ecosystem of drug trafficking networks”, it must disrupt itself first.

The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially replicate Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.